How Ukraine and Poland Can Prevent the Crisis from Deepening

The escalation of the conflict between Ukraine and Poland is a dangerous situation that could lead to unpredictable consequences. Clearly, both sides need to pause and avoid further escalation, as continuing radical actions, statements, or steps could trigger critical problems. For good reason, rational politicians, experts, and the business community are urging the presidents to end their disputes and focus on other crucial matters—of which there are plenty. This is especially true given the ongoing Russian aggression, which is currently directed at Ukraine but, under worst-case scenarios, could spread to Europe.

What is important for the sides to do?

• First, it would be advisable for President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to participate in the Ukraine Recovery Conference in Gdańsk. By no means would such a step look like a concession; on the contrary, it would demonstrate a commitment to constructive dialogue and an openness to finding optimal solutions for both Ukraine and Poland.
• Second, it is necessary to resume contacts at the level of the presidential teams. While grievances and misunderstandings have occurred, they must be set aside from vital matters for the sake of the common goal.
• Third, the politicization of historical matters must be stopped as soon as possible. A great format—the historians’ forum—was launched in May. The political leadership should only provide a platform and support for such discussions, rather than leading them. The scope of responsibility for presidents and governments lies in strategic security and defense issues.
• Fourth, restoring effective communication mechanisms will help create a model for future actions and consultations regarding contentious issues. It is Ukraine’s subjective right to name its military units. It is Poland’s subjective right to express its position and draw attention to topics that are painful for the Polish cultural consciousness. However, subjective rights must be exercised in a way that finds compromises rather than creating conflicts. Agreements on the future parameters of joint actions are the only way out of the deadlock, while further political speculation is a road to nowhere.
• Fifth, de-escalation is possible at this stage if this topic stops being the central focus of information policy. Everyone needs a pause, followed by a return to a constructive, pragmatic conversation. In the meantime, it is advisable to fill this pause with discussions and contracts in the defense industry, Ukraine’s reconstruction, the development of bilateral infrastructure, and similar areas.